Suppose we have 10.0g of some gas, which can be decomposed into two constituent elements: element A and element B.
Suppose that the 10.0g of the compound decomposes into 4.67g of element A and 5.33g of element B. This means that there are 1.14 grams of element B for every 1 gram of element A. This ratio holds for any quantity of the compound gas.
In example, if we had 11.5g of the compound now, this would decompose into 5.37g of element A and 6.13g of element B.
This one is a bit different than constant composition.
It states that if we have 2 compounds who are composed of the same elements (lets say the compounds were composed of elements A and B), that the ratio of the ratio of A to B (or B to A) of one compound to the other is a whole number. That was a mouthful.
To put it into context, consider the previous compound where we had 1.14 grams of element B for every gram of element A. Then, let’s say we have another compound is composed of 69.6% element B and 30.4% element A. The ratio of B to A is 2.28 in this scenario, which evenly divides into 1.14 for a ratio of ratios of 2, a whole number. This tells us that the latter compound has twice as many B atoms for every B atom in the former compound.
How can we explain this? One way we can explain this is that the molecules in the former compound are arranged as AB, and the latter compound is arranged as AB2.
And in fact, the values in the example actually correspond to the compound NO and NO2.
Cathode Ray Tubes were an unlikely place for the next step of chemistry, but it helped us understand the structure of the atom better. JJ Thomson was able to deduce from his experiment involving CRTs the mass-to-charge ratio of the particles in the stream from the CRT. This value was \(-5.69 \times 10^{-9}\text{ g/C}\). He was not able to independently determine the mass or charge though.
Robert Millikan on the other hand was able to determine the charge of an electron, measured to be \(-1.60 \times 10^{-19}\text{ C}\). Now that we know the charge, we can find the mass via the ratio; this comes out to be \(9.10 \times 10^{-31}\text{ kg}\).
These experiments marked the discovery of an electron. We found a subatomic particle, that exhibited the same properties (mass & charge) no matter what electron we sampled.
We know electrons exist now, but how are they organized in an atom? Well, Thomson proposed the Plum Pudding model. This model is named like this, to depict that an atom mostly contains a diffuse positively charged “pudding” (or spread). In the pudding resides small negative charges (electrons), or the plums. Is this correct? Well only one way to find out..
Rutherford comes around and does this experiment where he takes alpha particles and shoots them at a thin sheet of gold foil. Then he figures out what the path of the particles is after impact with the foil.
The results of this experiment was the discovery of the nucleus. Like in biology, the nucleus refers to the center, in this case of the atom. This is an object with a positive charge that is more massive when compared to the alpha particles.
With these new findings in mind, we present the Nuclear Model of the Atom: where the positively charged, massive part of the atom (nucleus) resides at the center. The electrons in the atom exist somewhere outside of the nucleus.
To keep scale in mind, it’s important to know that the atom itself is MUCH larger than the nucleus. Quantiatively, the nucleus is about 1/20,000th the size of the atom. This means the atom is mostly empty space! This makes sense, because that would explain why the alpha particles were going straight to the foil. Statistically, the nucleus makes up a small part of the atom, so only some were slightly deflected from the foil.
So, what exactly is the nucleus made up of? The nucleus is made up of two fundamental particles: protons and neutrons. Protons are positively charged, and they are about 2000 times more massive than an electron. Neutrons are neutral as their name implies, but their mass is the same as the proton. Nuclei can contain several protons and neutrons, and more importantly the nucleus composition tells us the identity of the atom.
Information about the subatomic particles:
Particle | Electric Charge | Mass | amu |
---|---|---|---|
Electron | -1.6 \(\times\) 10-19 C | 9.11 \(\times\) 10-31 | ~0 |
Proton | +1.6 \(\times\) 10-19 C | 1.67 \(\times\) 10-27 | 1 |
Neutron | 0 C | 1.67 \(\times\) 10-27 | 1 |
Important quantities:
A few examples:
It is important to know how the periodic table is laid out, so here’s a convenient picture:
Periodic Table
Some of these elements’ symbols don’t exactly match up with their name, so listed below are a few of them to keep them in mind:
In nature, very few substances exist as just an individual atom. In standard conditions only the noble gasses (that last group in the periodic table) can exist in monatomic, elemental form.
In most cases, we are dealing with substances that exist as molecules or ions.
So what are molecules? Molecules are aggregates of two or more atoms in a definite arrangement held together by chemical forces called bonds.
The definite arrangement explains the fixed ratios described by the Law of Constant Composition.
Some molecules consist of just two atoms, also known as diatomic molecules. Examples include hydrogen gas (\(\text{H}_{2}\)) and oxygen gas (\(\text{O}_{2}\)).
Others can contain more than 2, also known as polyatomic molecules. Examples include water (\(\text{H}_{2}\text{O}\)) and ammonia (\(\text{NH}_{3}\)).
For anions the suffix becomes -ide.
Some of these ion names just need to be memorized, especially the polyatomic ions..
The monatomic cations/anions are pretty straightforward.
Monatomic transition metal cations to know:
Ionic Compounds are electrically neutral, as they are composed of ionic bonds.
Certain ionic compounds absorb water molecules into their formula structures, known as hydrates. In terms of naming, you just append “
Types of bonding:
Covalent | Ionic |
---|---|
Electron Sharing | Electron Transfer |
Distinct Molecules | Crystal Lattice Structures |
Molecular Formula/Empirical Formula | Unit Formula |
Nonmetal & Nonmetal | Metal & Nonmetal |
Formulas:
Distinctions between molecular and empirical formula
Ethanediol (Ethylene Glycol) is a molecule that consists of 2 carbons, 6 hydrogens, and 2 oxygens.
Molecular formula (actual number of atoms):
\(\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{6}\text{O}_{2}\)
Ethanediol empirical formula (smallest whole number ratio):
\(\text{C}\text{H}_{3}\text{O}\)
Methanol molecular formula:
\(\text{C}\text{H}_{4}\text{O}\)
Methanol empirical formula:
\(\text{C}\text{H}_{4}\text{O}\)
A structural formula shows the connections/bonds between atoms: depict atoms by their elemental symbol, and draw lines between them to denote the bonds.
A condensed structural formula is similar to a structural formula, but it depicts the structure without any lines as contiguous text (\(\text{C}\text{H}_{2}\text{O}\text{H}\text{C}\text{H}_{2}\text{O}\text{H}\)).
The line angle formula shows carbon groups. Each line’s ends/angles represent a carbon, and the carbon’s other bonds are hydrogen unless explicitly written out.
Dimethyl peroxide is \(\text{C}_{2}\text{H}_{6}\text{O}_{2}\). Notice it is the same formula as ethanediol, but these are different molecules. If two molecules have the same molecular formula, but different structural formulas, then they are called isomers.
Ionic formulas must use unit structure. Consider a NaCl crystal. The crystal lattice might be composed of many sodium and chlorine atoms, but when we use unit structure we describe the atoms in their smallest whole number ratio.
Covalent compounds are always between a non-metal and a non-metal, and their bonds share electrons. In terms of naming, first element keeps its full name, and second element has an “ide” ending. You also use prefixes to denote the number. i.e. CO refers to carbon monoxide and \(\text{CO}_{2}\) refers to carbon dioxide.
Acids have a hydrogen atom as the first element. 3 categories:
Number | Formula | Condensed Formula | Prefix | name |
---|---|---|---|---|
? | \(C_{n}H_{2n+2}\) | \(C_{n}H_{2n+2}\) | Alk- | Alkane |
1 | \(CH_{4}\) | \(CH_{4}\) | Meth- | Methane |
2 | \(C_{2}H_{6}\) | \(CH_{3}CH_{3}\) | Eth- | Ethane |
3 | \(C_{3}H_{8}\) | \(CH_{3}CH_{2}CH_{3}\) | Prop- | Propane |
4 | \(C_{4}H_{10}\) | \(CH_{3}CH_{2}CH_{2}CH_{3}\) | But- | Butane |
Three examples:
Examples of the functional groups:
Atomic mass is not the mass number of an element.
Example: Chlorine has two naturally occurring isotopes:
These mass numbers aren’t exactly the mass:
We also need the relative abundances
To calculate the atomic mass, we take a weighted average with the abundances acting as the weights:
## [1] 35.42776
Mole: \(6.022 \times 10^{23}\) elementary units per mole (Avogadro’s number: \(N_{A}\))
Definition: 1 mole of \(^{12} C\) atoms has a mass of 12 grams exactly.
\(1\text{ g} = 6.022 \times 10^{23}\text{ amu}\)
1.27 grams of Carbon to moles?
\[ \frac{1.27\text{ g}}{} * \frac{1\text{ mol}}{12.011\text{ g}} = 0.106\text{ mol of Carbon} \]
Moles to atoms?
\[ 0.10573\text{ mol} * \frac{6.022 \times 10^{23}\text{ atoms}}{\text{mol}} = 6.37 \times 10^{22}\text{ atoms} \]
Elements | Atoms | Atomic Mass | Mass contribution of each element |
---|---|---|---|
C | 1 | 12.011 g/mol | 12.011 g/mol |
H | 4 | 1.00794 g/mol | 4.03176 g/mol |
O | 1 | 15.9994 g/mol | 15.9994 g/mol |
Sum the mass contribution for each element: \(32.04216\text{ g/mol}\). This is the atomic mass of methanol.
Sample of methanol has a mass of 79.18 g. How many atoms are in the sample?
Let’s convert from mass to moles. Notice that we have already calculated the molar mass in the previous example: \(32.04216\text{ g/mol}\).
\[ \frac{79.18\text{ g}}{} * \frac{1\text{ mol}}{32.042\text{ g}} = 2.47\text{ mol of methanol} \]
Moles to molecules
\[ \frac{2.4711364\text{ mol}}{} * \frac{6.022 \times 10^{23}\text{ molecules}}{\text{ mol}} = 1.488 \times 10^{24}\text{ molecules} \]
Atoms
\[ \frac{1.488 \times 10^{24}\text{ molecules}}{} * \frac{6\text{ atom}}{\text{molecule}} = 8.928 \times 10^{24}\text{ atoms} \]
Carbon atoms
\[ \frac{1.488 \times 10^{24}\text{ molecules}}{} * \frac{1\text{ C atom}}{\text{molecule}} = 1.488 \times 10^{24}\text{ atoms} \]
Can do the same for hydrogen
Divide each mass contribution for each element by the total molar mass. This gives you the percent composition.
atomic_masses <- c(12.011, 4.03176, 15.9994)
total_mass <- sum(atomic_masses)
((atomic_masses) / total_mass) * 100
## [1] 37.48499 12.58267 49.93234
For a certain compound, the mass percent is:
Element | Percent Mass |
---|---|
C | 24.27% |
Cl | 71.65% |
H | 4.07% |
What is the empirical formula of this compound?
We can think of this question as:
Convert to moles, then divide by smallest value:
masses <- c(24.27, 71.65, 4.07)
atomic_masses <- c(12.011, 35.4527, 1.00794)
# Moles conversion
moles <- masses / atomic_masses
# Get smallest value of mole for the empirical formula
smallest_value <- min(moles)
moles / smallest_value
## [1] 1.000000 1.000176 1.998339
## [1] 1 1 2
Element | Percent Mass |
---|---|
Na | 17.55% |
Cr | 39.70% |
O | 42.75% |
masses <- c(17.55, 39.70, 42.75)
atomic_masses <- c(22.99, 52.00, 16.00)
# Moles conversion
moles <- masses / atomic_masses
# Get smallest value of mole for the empirical formula
smallest_value <- min(moles)
moles / smallest_value
## [1] 1.000000 1.000113 3.500080
We can double these to get our whole number ratio
masses <- c(17.55, 39.70, 42.75)
atomic_masses <- c(22.99, 52.00, 16.00)
# Moles conversion
moles <- masses / atomic_masses
# Get smallest value of mole for the empirical formula
smallest_value <- min(moles)
2 * (moles / smallest_value)
## [1] 2.000000 2.000226 7.000160
Combustion analysis of a C, H, and N compound.
A sample of 0.1156g yields 0.1638g \(CO_{2}\) and 0.1676g \(H_{2}O\).
total_sample_mass <- 0.1156
carbondioxide_sample <- 0.1638
water_sample <- 0.1676
carbondioxide_molarmass <- 44.01
carbon_molarmass <- 12.011
water_molarmass <- 18.01
hydrogen_molarmass <- 1.00794
nitrogen_molarmass <- 14.00674
carbondioxide_moles <- carbondioxide_sample / carbondioxide_molarmass
carbon_moles <- carbondioxide_moles
carbon_mass <- carbon_moles * carbon_molarmass
water_moles <- water_sample / water_molarmass
# For every mole of H2O, there are 2 moles of H
hydrogen_moles <- 2 * water_moles
hydrogen_mass <- hydrogen_moles * hydrogen_molarmass
nitrogen_mass <- total_sample_mass - (carbon_mass + hydrogen_mass)
nitrogen_moles <- nitrogen_mass / nitrogen_molarmass
smallest <- min(carbon_moles, hydrogen_moles, nitrogen_moles)
result <- c(carbon_moles, hydrogen_moles, nitrogen_moles) / smallest
paste0("Carbon moles ", result[1])
## [1] "Carbon moles 1"
## [1] "Hydrogen moles 5.00066507617868"
## [1] "Nitrogen moles 1.00010352749297"
So, our empirical formula is: \(CH_{5}N\)
Say we have this compound: \(CH_{2}Cl\)
With this molecular mass: 98.95 g/mol
carbon_mass <- 12.011
hydrogen_mass <- 1.00794
chlorine_mass <- 35.4527
molar_mass <- 1 * carbon_mass + 2 * hydrogen_mass + 1 * chlorine_mass
molar_mass
## [1] 49.47958
## [1] 2
## [1] "Carbon scaled up to 2"
## [1] "Hydrogen scaled up to 4"
## [1] "Chlorine scaled up to 2"
So, the molecular formula is \(C_{2}H_{4}Cl_{2}\).
\[ A + B \rightarrow C + D \]
A and B are reactants (reagents) (everything on the left hand side of the arrow).
C and D are products (everything on the right hand side of the arrow).
Rxn arrow indicates that a chemical reaction takes place.
Products appear on the right hand side, and represent the results of a rxn.
A couple of heuristics:
Problem statement:
Write a balanced equation for the chemical reaction when an ionic compound is formed from 0.636 g of oxygen and 0.689 g of chromium.
Moles of oxygen:
## [1] 0.019875
Moles of chromium:
## [1] 0.01325
Ratio of moles of oxygen gas to chromium:
## [1] 1.499962
This means for every 3 moles of oxygen gas we have 2 moles of chromium (1.5 mole ratio).
Our chemical formula is then:
\[ 2 Cr + 3 O_{2} \rightarrow 2 Cr O_{3} \]
Notice the 2 present in the chromium compound in the products – we had to balance.
In chemical formulas, you may see the state of matter appended to the substance
Suppose we have a recipe that calls for:
These ingredients are to make 4 servings of pastry creme.
Now suppose we have readily available:
The limiting reagent is the eggs: they cap the recipe to be made 9 times, whereas the other ingredients can make 10 or more. The other ingredients are what we call the excess reagents.
There are three important questions for limiting/excess reagents questions:
For the combustion rxn between 35.00 g \(C_{4}H_{10}\) (butane) and 45.00 g \(O_{2}\)
Balance equation:
\[ 2 C_{4}H_{10} + 13O_{2} \rightarrow 8 CO_{2} + 10 H_{2}O \]
Moles of butane:
butane_present <- 35.00
butane_molar_mass <- (12.011 * 4) + (1.00794 * 10)
butane_present / butane_molar_mass
## [1] 0.6021671
Moles of oxygen gas:
## [1] 1.406303
## [1] 2.335403
Notice that this ratio of \(\approx 2.3\) is less than \(\frac{13}{2}\) (the mole ratio between \(O_{2}\) and \(C_{4}H_{10}\)). This means that the oxygen gas has to be the limiting reagent, since the supply of oxygen gas is not high enough to meet the mole ratio.
Now use the limiting reagent moles to find the product moles via stoichiometry:
Moles of \(CO_{2}\)
\[ \frac{1.406303}{} * \frac{8}{13} = 0.8652 \text{ mol} \]
This can then be converted into grams using the molar mass of carbon dioxide:
\[ 0.8652 * 44.01 = 38.08 \]
Moles of \(H_{2}O\)
\[ \frac{1.406303}{} * \frac{10}{13} = 1.08177 \text{ mol} \]
Grams of water:
\[ 1.08177 * 18.01 = 19.49 \]
Now, how much of the excess reagents remain (in this case, butane)?
Find used amount of moles of butane:
\[ 1.406303 * \frac{2}{13} = 0.2163 \]
We had \(0.6022\) moles of butane originally, so that means what we have remaining is:
\[ 0.6022 - 0.2163 = 0.3859 \]
We can then convert to grams:
\[ 0.3859 * 58.124 = 22.43 \]
So we have 22.43 grams of butane left after rxn is complete.
Suppose we have the following chemical formula:
\[ 2 NH_{3} + 3O_{2} = 2 CH_{4} \rightarrow 2 HCN + 6 H_{2}O \]
Following are the molar masses:
Suppose we start with:
Questions to ask:
Ammonia moles:
\[ 11.5 * 17.03 = 0.675 \]
Oxygen moles:
\[ 12.0 * 32.00 = 0.375 \]
Methane moles:
\[ 10.5 * 16.04 = 0.655 \]
Notice that the number of oxygen moles is the smallest, yet we must have 3 moles of oxygen gas compared to the other two reactants which require only 2 moles. So, oxygen is the limiting reagent.
We can then use the number of moles of oxygen gas to find the moles of HCN (This comes out to be 0.250 moles). This can then be converted to grams.
Then, we can find the used moles of the excess reagents via stoichiometry with the limiting reagent, and then subtract to find the excess moles. We can then convert these into grams.
In the case of a limiting reagent, it’s fair to say that the rxn did not go to its full potential. That is to say, there is a theoretical max potential of the rxn, and what actually happened. The actual yield is what we actually have left, which may or may not have suffered the consequences of a limiting reagent. The theoretical yield is what we would have had if the excess reagents could have been used in full. The ratio is the percent yield, or a description of the utilization of the reagents.